Welcome to Writers Talkback. If you are a new user, your account will have to be approved manually to prevent spam. Please bear with us in the meantime
I'm beginning to wonder if writing is becoming a second citizen. Most articles I write are on topics where I can also supply photos and many magazines simply pay a single package for that - so much per page for example. (I've certainly found there has been a greater acceptance rate where I can supply both words and pictures.) However, two recent payments have separated out the payments for words and pictures and in one case the total payment for the pictures is almost double that for the words. The words have taken me time to research, write, edit, redraft and so on and take x hours, the photos have often taken little more than a considered point and shoot as I tend to use my camera in auto mode. Is this the experience of others?
Comments
And make sure you don't forget to do your DACS form filling (when applicable).
DACS and ALCS help bump it all up.
I have added the pics to my list for DACS but can only submit them August to October each year. Thanks for the reminder.
[quote=Liz]Picture books are notoriously more lucrative for illustrators than the writer[/quote]
I suppose with an illustrator the time taken on the work could be of equal length or even longer than that spent by the writer. Being able to do both would be a real bonus there! For photographs I might have to travel (but I tend to only take pics when I am going somewhere anyway) but in many cases I have been able to take pics in my own home with little time or effort required. When I wrote an article on using quinces for example I simply took photos at each stage of recipes and they were used. Secret is definitely never to be without a camera as well as a notebook it seems. I've asked other writers of non-fiction and they seem to find this is a common occurence so I can only conclude it is more trouble for magazines to source illustrations than it is to get people to write for them!
[quote=Wordy]The words have taken me time to research, write, edit, redraft and so on and take x hours, the photos have often taken little more than a considered point and shoot as I tend to use my camera in auto mode. Is this the experience of others?[/quote]
Again, because I write travel articles in the main, the photos I take for an article are very much part of my submission. I probably do spend more time on the words, but if I have to go out specifically to take photos for a feature, that can be time consuming. Sometimes, I have to get up very early to be on location just as dawn breaks, for example. :)
I think only about twenty percent of the titles I have contributed to have paid for the words and pictures separately but it certainly gives an insight into how words and pictures are valued.
I don't think so - equal maybe, but- I don't think so. Picture books are fiendish to write.
I took 5 years to write my book. A long time I know! but once all the info was in place, my illustrator took 3 days to do the B&W illustrations (about 20) and 2 days to paint the cover.
Oh, and edit to say, she got paid 3 times what i did.